Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Product Safety’ Category


In our household, we love yogurt. But ever since we’ve become more aware of the negative impact plastics have on our health, wildlife, the environment, and the future of our planet, eating the stuff has left a … ahem … sour taste in our mouths.

Now, if I go to our organic food store, I can find yogurt in a large glass jar. But, there’s no low-fat version and certainly no sheep milk yogurt (which I prefer). At the regular grocery store, we can find large 14-oz/400g plastic containers which somehow make me feel slightly less guilty, but still not a long-term solution. The most common is the worst: those “cute” 4-oz/125g containers of yogurt that are so much more practical, right?

Eating yogurt = guilty pleasure. :-(

But as of this afternoon, we can take the guilty out of our pleasure. (more…)

Read Full Post »


From "The Story of Cosmetics"

Earlier in the week, I presented a dilemma I had last year with the cosmetic industry. I was shocked to discover what we’re putting on our and our children’s faces, bodies, and even in our mouths (in toothpastes).

I shared my own natural beauty solutions, which I hope you’ll consider and adapt for yourself. But, in addition, I think it’s important that we help the beauty industry do their own makeover to keep us, future generations, and our wildlife and environment safe.

Simple actions we can all take (more…)

Read Full Post »


About eight months ago I began a descent toward hell. With the intent of doing an Impact Effort on commercially-made beauty products, I started doing research into ingredients typically included in these items. What I found was disturbing, in many cases, frightening.

My dilemma: I didn’t know how to present my findings to YOU. I, personally, don’t believe in scare tactics as a motivator — mostly because they depress and de-motivate me. On top of that, if I presented the findings, I‘d have to take action, too. So, I put it all aside, and Nils and I went along our merry way doing other Impact efforts. I closed my eyes and buried my head in the sand.

From The Story of Cosmetics

No more rose-colored glasses

But, I found myself looking at the cosmetics and hair and skin products in our home with a jaundiced eye. (more…)

Read Full Post »


This is turning out to be such a fun week. I’m lovin’ being a Slacktivist and thanks to a friend, I now have a new word to add to my vocabulary: Slacktivity! (Thanks, Joe. I think I’ll submit it to Merriam-Webster).

This trying really hard to do as little as possible and have an Impact is turning out to be quite … well … dare I say … productive!

Aside from getting more coffee, I haven’t moved my backside from my office desk, and along with getting work done, here’s what this Slacktivist has done so far:

  • Sent a letter (link to sample pdf) to Ellen Degeneres (who I absolutely adore and always will) asking her to please give up her promotion of bottled water. (please mention 52weeksofimpact.org — of course only if you write a polite letter :-) ).
  • Sent another letter (link to sample pdf) to the United Nations, this time directly to inquiries@un.org, asking them to condemn stoning and to not allow Ahmadinejad to address the General Assembly.
  • Sent a letter through ONE to President Obama to commit to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
  • Voiced my opinion (strongly) in an online Frankenfish debate. (my next step is to find an avenue to let the FDA know how I feel).
  • Joined The Extraordinaries (a micro-volunteering group “where people use their professional skills to solve nonprofits’ challenges in 10 minutes, or less.”). I brainstormed some ideas to help promote in2Books, an eMentoring program for elementary school students. The Extraordinaries is a very cool place to micro-volunteer.

We’ve already gotten a handful of great Slacktivist Slacktivity submitted for our Slacktivist Impact Challenge (say that five times fast). Thanks to those who have already started Slacking off. To those who haven’t yet gotten around to sitting on their lazy backsides, send your submissions. Your charity of choice could win a small donation.

I think Nils and I’ll have a competition to see who can be lazier at the weekend. Imagine how much Impact we could have!

Read Full Post »


My Facebook friends already know that this past week ended grumpily for me. I was referred to as a “Slacktivist”, and while it was said tongue-in-cheek, it still ticked me off. Before I continued on in my dark mood, I figured I’d best check the definition of the term. Perhaps I was misjudging. Neither Merriam Webster nor Oxford dictionaries online had “Slacktivist”, so I went with often trusty Wikipedia.

Today’s definition

Wikipedia says, “The word is considered a pejorative term that describes “feel-good” measures, in support of an issue or social cause, that have little or no practical effect other than to make the person doing it feel satisfaction. The acts also tend to require little personal effort from the slacktivist.” Hurumph.

“Examples …  include signing internet petitions, the wearing of wristbands (“awareness bracelets”) … putting a ribbon magnet on a vehicle, joining a Facebook group, posting issue-oriented YouTube videos, … or taking part in short-term boycotts such as Buy Nothing Day or Earth Hour.” I don’t exactly get why these are judged as ‘bad” things. Some are, indeed, things that Nils and I have chosen to do, others not, but each can be effective in building awareness and can have Impact, albeit in their own small way.

The definition I choose

I’ve decided to accept this in good spirit because I discovered that the term was “… coined by Dwight Ozard in1995,” with a different meaning. It was used to describe the young people of that time doing good work on a small, personal, individual scale (rather than en masse in demonstrations, marches or sit-ins). In my view, that could mean helping a small community or classroom, or one child, animal or adult in need. As a good friend of mine reminded me, “From small drops, big oceans are formed.”

The truth of the matter? 52 Weeks of Impact isn’t about coordinating large efforts, it’s about “achiev(ing) maximum impact with ‘reasonable investment’ of time, energy or money.” That could also be read as “little personal effort,” I suppose.

This week’s challenge

In the spirit of Slacktivism (by the definition I choose), I invite our lazy friends and followers to join us this week in doing as little as possible, with maximum Impact. No, honestly, this is no joke. I am forever surprised at what kind of opportunities there are to have Impact by doing little. See just how much Impact you can have by NOT going out of your way.

We’re going to run this Slacktivist challenge for the next two weeks and:

We’ll donate $25 U.S./20 Euro* to the winner’s favorite charity

Here’s the challenge:

  • Send us your best Slacktivist Impact Effort(s) — the lazier the better, but of course it must have some Impact. Give a brief description of your Impact Effort (provide a link to an organization, if applicable) and the Impact you think you had. Submit below in comments or go to Contact us. (Make sure you leave an email address for us to contact you)
  • The Efforts must be things you’ve done (we’ll have to trust you on this).
  • You may submit as many Slacktivist Impact Efforts as you want by midnight EST on Tuesday, October 5th, 2010.
  • On (or about) October 6th, Nils and I will short-list what we think are the top Efforts and (as soon as possible) we’ll post them online for voting.
  • The Slacktivist Impact Effort with the most number of votes wins.
  • The winner may choose any 501(c) or equivalent officially recognized charity and Nils and I will donate $25 U.S*.

Efforts will be judged on any or all of the following criteria:

  • Effectiveness,
  • Ratio of Laziness to Impact,
  • Coolness Factor,
  • Originality, and
  • whatever else strikes us at the moment.

Some examples to get your creative Impact juices flowing

  • Earlier this year we did a week of Effortless Impact with click-to-donate sites. Since then, we’ve discovered that’s only the beginning.
  • If you’ve read of a company doing something that’s contrary to your political or ethical leanings, choose not to support them, and send them a letter or a simple email telling them why you’ve not a customer.  (A list of current consumer boycotts can be found at Ethical Consumer).
  • It’s the start of autumn (or spring for those in the southern hemisphere) and time for autumn/spring cleaning. What can you give away to charity? Click for decluttering ideas and clearing out closet ideas.
  • Heading to your local library? Take a glance  through your books and see what you can donate.
  • Going to a grocery store, library, school, yoga class, or somewhere else that has a community bulletin board? Print out a pdf flyer on the symptoms of ovarian cancer and post it to create awareness.
  • Do you play Farmville on Facebook? Just by playing and collecting virtual school supplies from your FV friends you can work toward having Zynga donate $100k U.S. toward building a school for Haitian children.

Got questions? Please feel free to write us below.

Now, go out (or stay in) and be a good Slacktivist!

*Approximately $20 EUR, $26 AUD, 16 GBP, $26 CAD, 178 ZAR

Read Full Post »


Some months ago, my sister and two other 52 Week followers asked if we could do some testing of natural cleaning products on the market. With much of our audience being in the U.S., it didn’t make sense to do studies from Europe with European products. Now that I’m in the States on vacation, it seemed a perfect opportunity. I, too, am interested in finding more environmentally-sound cleaning products, but am afraid to give up effectiveness and cleanliness.

So, I spent this week cleaning my sister and brother-in-law’s kitchen and bathroom. Did I mention that I’m on vacation?

The Result: My sister’s house is nice and clean, she has an enormous stock of good, adequate and one downright bad cleaning products under her sink, and I have several broken nails and chapped hands. But, we’re both the wiser for the experience, and, here, I share:

  • Lesson #1: Not all traits are inherited. Dad was an experimental scientist renowned in his field (he even specialized in testing of materials), we struggled with these experiments — you have to compare “apples to apples” and maintain controls and minimize variables. Urg!
  • Lesson #2: Pretty packaging has nothing to do with anything, except that … well, it’s awfully purdy!
  • Lesson #3: Never step too far away from your experiment, someone may clean up your mess.
  • Lesson #4: Simple does sometimes = best.

What we tested

My sister and I tested a few different popular brands of “environmentally-friendly” products, along with a couple of my own natural “concoctions.” Preferences in the end weren’t brand specific.

All Purpose Cleaner

Products Tested: “Mrs. Meyer’s” Clean Day All Purpose Cleaner (Lemon Verbena scent) vs. “Seventh Generation” Natural Multi-Surface Concentrated Cleaner (Lavender & Juniper Citrus) vs. “Seventh Generation” Natural Glass & Surface Cleaner (Free & Clear)

"turmeric sun" - ground-in counter stain

Products were tested  on ground-in “sun” designs made in turmeric on a kitchen countertop and were evaluated on smell, effectiveness, and ease of use.

As recommended on the packaging, “Mrs. Meyer’s” and “Seventh Generation” were diluted. All three products worked fine on the counter and removed debris and new food stains with equal ease. But …

  1. “Mrs. Meyer’s” Clean Day All Purpose CleanerFirst place! Used “straight” and allowed to sit for a few minutes before sponging up as directed for “tough stains”, Mrs. Meyer’s beat all in removing the turmeric stain as well as an old pen mark. We both liked the smell of this product! It’s fresh and clean smelling, without being overpowering.
  2. “Seventh Generation” Natural Multi-Surface Concentrated Cleaner – Used in concentrated form and allowed to sit for a few minutes, this product worked well on the turmeric stain and the old pen mark. However, the solution is very soapy and required a lot of rinsing. The scent is “clean” smelling and would be good in the bathroom or elsewhere in the house. However, I wasn’t keen on the aroma in the kitchen; it was a little bit too “pine-y” and overwhelming.
  3. “Seventh Generation” Natural Glass & Surface Cleaner – As a simple spray-on cleaner for superficial cleaning, this product worked fine. It was not useful on the turmeric stain nor on the old pen mark, even when allowed to sit for several minutes. For those who are sensitive to odors, the Free & Clear line is scentless. For me, this put this product at somewhat of a disadvantage — nothing “smelled” clean.

Note:  due to my brother-in-law inadvertently cleaning the counter in the middle of an experiment, we also know that Ultra Sun Light Antibacterial “Dawn” dish detergent (sorry, the bottle is labeled “Sun Light”, but my sister tells me that the contents are different than what the label indicates — controlled testing isn’t always simple :-P ) and elbow grease works well on turmeric stains. This, however, was NOT done within a “controlled” environment.

Conclusion: Yes, we can be clean and green.

Tub and Tile Cleaner

Products Tested: “Seventh Generation” Natural Tub & Tile Cleaner (Emerald Cypress & Fir) vs. “Attitude” Eco Cleaner Bathroom Mold & Mildew vs. “A Natural Bathroom Cleaner Concoction”.

- Bathroom Sink: Initially, we tested the “Seventh Generation” and “Attitude” cleaners, each on half of the bathroom sink and counter. Both products worked equally well against surface dirt. Neither worked particularly well on soap scum or mildew. However, we did not allow the products to sit as long as was recommended. We had to clean up the products quickly …

We could not thoroughly test the “Attitude” product because it smelled so horrible. I called it the odor of “old soap,” my sister identified it as the smell of “soap scum.” Perhaps “Attitude” takes a homeopathic approach using the “law of similars”, in this case, using soap scum to get rid of soap scum? But, the smell was … well, it was disgusting. We couldn’t stand inhaling it, so we cut this study short knowing that the products would be tested later in the tub.

- Tub: Working in a bathroom with better air circulation, I gave “Attitude” Bathroom Mold & Mildew another chance and sprayed it on 1/3rd of the tub. “Seventh Generation” Tub and Tile Cleaner got another third, and “A Natural Bathroom Cleaner Concoction” went on the last third.

Products were tested on accumulated soap scum (in defense of my sister and her housecleaning abilities, I specifically asked her not to clean her bathrooms before I got here) in the bath tiles and tub, and were evaluated based on effectiveness, and ease of use.

All worked equally well on the upper tiles (that had little soap scum) as a “spray and wash off”.  But, honestly, I couldn’t stand the smell of the “Attitude” product any longer and I refused to continue testing it.

On tough soap scum in the tub, I sprayed the tub with water, sprayed “Seventh Generation” on 1/2 and “a Natural Concoction” on the other 1/2, and let them both sit for five minutes.

These two “finalists” came out pretty close.

  1. “Seventh Generation” Tub and Tile CleanerFirst Place! After ten minutes, using only a sponge (no abrasive), the scum came off with little effort. It gets an “A” rating in my book! The Emerald Cypress & Fir aroma is pleasant, albeit a bit strong.
  2. “A Natural Concoction*Very close second! I had to give the tub an extra swipe, (still no additional abrasive), but the scum came off without a problem. I’m convinced that had I let it sit for a couple more minutes, the scum would’ve come off with equal ease. I personally love the peppermint aroma of Dr. Bronner’s (see recipe below), but it could be overwhelming for some (any other type of Castile soap can be used in its place). Note: price is not a factor in this “study”, but if it were, this homemade concoction would come in First – very inexpensive to make!

*Natural Bathroom Cleaner Concoction (adapted from Earth Scrub Tub and Tile Cleaner)

Baking soda 1-1/3 cups
Liquid Castile soap (I prefer Dr. Bronner’s Magic Pure Castile Soap – Peppermint) ½ cup
Water ½ cup
White vinegar 2 Tbsp.
Lemon juice ½ lemon

Put all into a squirt bottle and shake to mix all ingredients well. Periodically shake the bottle when using. If the mixture gets too thick, dilute with water.

Conclusion: Yes, we definitely can be clean and green.

Glass and Mirror Cleaner

Products Tested: “Method” Best in Glass vs. “Seventh Generation” Natural Glass & Surface Cleaner vs. “Windex” vs. “A Natural Glass Cleaner.”

All products were tested on two different bathroom mirrors and evaluated on: effectiveness, rate of drying, streakiness.

All the natural products cleaned equally well. Sad to report that Windex, indeed, was slightly most effective in that it dried fastest and left the least amount of streaking. However, the difference (we’re talking about one more swipe of the paper towel and a few more seconds of drying time) was not significant enough for me to place it above the others, weighing the fact that it is not an natural product and contains ammonia.

  1. “A Natural Glass Cleaner”*First Place! Cleaned well, no streaking, dried quickly and clear. A cheap and easy homemade alternative.
  2. “Seventh Generation” Natural Glass & Surface Cleaner - Cleaned well. Though it initially had a “soapy” film, it dried clear with few streaks.
  3. “Method” Best in Glass – Cleaned well, but took several more swipes to get dry and streak free.
  4. Windex – It admittedly cleaned well, didn’t streak, and dried quickly. But, it does contain ammonia (“Ammonia-D” is merely their trademarked name for ammonia) which, as used in cleaning products, is a caustic and corrosive chemical that can be a hazard to lungs and skin.

*Natural Glass Cleaner

Water 1 cup
White vinegar ¼ cup
Castile liquid soap a couple of drops

Put all into a squirt bottle and shake to mix all ingredients well. (Note: the liquid soap will help break down any waxy build-up that might have been left on windows or mirrors by other cleaning products) Periodically shake the bottle when using. Note: while I wouldn’t advise cleaning your mirrors and windows with this concoction right before guests come by, the smell of vinegar does disperse to nothing quickly.

Conclusion: Ditto! Clean and green go together.

Powder Cleanser (This section added 7/7/2019)

Products Tested: “Mrs. Meyer’s” Clean Day Surface Scrub (Lemon Verbena) vs. “Bon Ami” Powder Cleanser.

Products were tested on my sister’s porcelain kitchen sink and evaluated on: smell, ease of use, and effectiveness. Approximately equal amounts were sprinkled on two-halves of the sink.

Old tradition vs pleasant scent

Two Winners! Both Mrs. Meyer’s and Bon Ami came out on top. Mrs. Meyer’s was a bit more difficult to open initially (the opening needed to be “punched” out and it took several efforts), but once open, both products were equally simple to use; the powder of both flowed easily and freely. Both also tested equally well in effectiveness. The sink had black marks from pots and pans and a few tough, yellow, set-in stains. Black marks were gone in a flash with both products, using only a sponge! The set-in-stains (surprisingly) were removed by letting the powders sit for a few minutes, followed by some “elbow grease” and the more abrasive side of a sponge.

The only significant difference between the two is the smell. Bon Ami is scentless and probably preferred by many; Mrs. Meyer’s has a very pleasant “lemon-verbena” scent that I personally like. I’m a bit torn between the two products because while I’d lean toward the nice scent, I admire the Bon Ami tradition. It’s been around for 120 with a history of being natural long before “natural” was cool.

More testing to come

We still have two one additional types of product we haven’t yet tested: dishwasher detergent and scouring powder. We have too many people in the house doing too many loads of dishes or cleaning too many places and our experiment keeps getting washed away. We’ll report our results as soon as more dirty dishes and grime are generated. Watch this space in the days to come.

Have your own favorites?

If you have other natural products that you’ve tested and particularly like, we welcome your suggestions. If you like the smell of old soap scum, my sister has a nearly new bottle of bathroom cleaner that she’s more than happy to pass along. Last, but not least, should I ever come visit you and you want me to clean your house, think again ;-) .

Read Full Post »


As a kid, I’d go to the pool at 8:00 a.m. for swim team practice and spend the entire day either in the pool or nearby, soaking up the sun, sometimes remembering to “moisturize” with Johnson’s baby oil. I did that nearly every day during summers for several years. Thank goodness we know better now and can be safe and protected with our skin cancer protecting, high level SPF sunscreens.

Or can we?

There’s been a lot of noise lately about sunscreens. As a bit of a skeptic, I had to do my own research. It’s been a challenge sorting through the hype, fear-mongering, assumptions and “urban legend” mixed in between fact-based studies. Sorry to report, there is, indeed, well-documented, but poorly publicized studies on the inadequacies and potential dangers of sunscreens.

Hype aside, here’s some bits of what I found:

Buyer and Slatherer Beware!

In 2007, following heavy pressure for decades to develop safety standards, the Food and Drug Administration in the United States stated, “FDA is not aware of data demonstrating that sunscreen use alone helps prevent skin cancer.” I don’t know about you, but that surprised me. So, what are we smearing all over our bodies, faces, and our children!? And, why?

This information combined with the inclusion of some “highly questionable” (my interpretation) ingredients gives cause for apprehension:

  • Oxybenzone, one of the more controversial ingredients in sunscreens, is used in 60 percent of non-mineral-based sunscreens in the U.S. It ‘s been found to be hormone disrupting, also releases free radicals, and can trigger allergic reactions. Though its impact on humans is not yet clear, oxybenzone is NOT recommended for use on children. As of this writing, oxybenzone can be found in some formulas of popular brands of sunscreens including Banana Boat, Coppertone and Hawaiian Tropics. For other names that oxybenzone might be listed as, go to the EWG (Environmental Working Group)* Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Database.
  • Retinyl Palmitate is another sunscreen ingredient causing concern. It is used in some 41 percent of sunscreens distributed in the U.S. Studies by the National Center for Toxicological Research and the National Toxicology Program suggest that retinyl palmitate may be photocarcinogenic (in other words, in the presence of UV rays, the compound and skin change biochemically and could result in cancer). Additionally, over the years, the FDA scientists have published some 17 studies on the toxicity and chemistry of retinyl palmitate on the skin. The conclusions are similar to that of the NCTR and the NTP. While evidence for humans is yet conclusive, the EWG suggests that we avoid sunscreen products with retinyl palmitate.
  • Overselling: Studies** show that people typically apply about 1/4 of the recommended amount of sunscreen. In fact, “in everyday practice, a product labeled SPF 100 actually performs like SPF 3.2, an SPF 30 rating equates to a 2.3 and SPF 15 translates to 2. Moreover, FDA scientists say SPF claims above 50 cannot be reliably substantiated,” states the EWG.

What To Do!?

The Parasol: Summer 2010 Fashion Accessory?

The jury’s still officially out on the aforementioned ingredients, so “conventional wisdom” says we should still take Mary Schmich‘s advice and/or the lyrics of “Everybody’s Free” and “WEAR SUNSCREEN“, but do so with care and:

  1. read the ingredients, and until we know more,
  2. avoid products that contain oxybenzone or retinyl palmitate.
  3. Protect your body with clothing and wear a hat and sunglasses.
  4. Avoid the sun. Yes, we still need our vitamin D, but what’s considered “sufficient” is measured in minutes per day of sun exposure, NOT time baking! (The amount of sun exposure you get walking from your car to the beach and putting down your towel is possibly more than recommended.)
  5. The U.S. Center for Disease Control provides the following tips for proper sunscreen application:  1) Be sure to apply enough sunscreen. As a rule of thumb, use one ounce/29 grams (a handful) to cover your entire body. 2) Use on all parts of your skin exposed to the sun, including the ears, back, shoulders, and the back of the knees and legs. 3) Apply thickly and thoroughly. 4) Be careful when applying sunscreen around the eyes.
  6. What do you think of bringing back parasols as a fashion accessory? :-)

Where to Find Safe Products?

I’ve come across a couple of non-commercial (and what I believe are dependable) lists of sunscreen products that are free of the above ingredients, as well as a few others.

The Daily Green21 of the Best Sunscreens

Environmental Working GroupBest Beach and Sport Sunscreens

Good News for Europeans

  • In Europe, products containing oxybenzone must carry a warning label.
  • Europe is often cited for the fact that it markets sunscreen products with active ingredients that are decades ahead of what is available in the U.S. While U.S. sunscreens will block out UVB rays, European products can contain ingredients that block both UVB and UVA rays. While UVB rays are said to be the most potent and previously thought to be the  main cause of skin cancer, according to the Skin Cancer Foundation, “Studies over the past two decades … show that … UVA contributes to and may even initiate the development of skin cancers.” (NOTE: some UVA-protecting products have recently become available in the U.S., but at exorbitant prices)

Now What?

I, personally, am going to go through our medicine cabinet and get online to see what our sunscreen products contain. How about you?

===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====

* The Environmental Working Group is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with the organizational goals to:
1. To protect the most vulnerable segments of the human population—children, babies, and infants in the womb—from health problems attributed to a wide array of toxic contaminants.
2. To replace federal policies, including government subsidies that damage the environment and natural resources, with policies that invest in conservation and sustainable development.
** Department of Dermatology, D92, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers